Three studies with a total sample size of N = 416 psychology students were conducted. Following our understanding of epistemic sophistication as a cautious and reluctant endorsement of both positions, we assume evaluativism (a contextually adaptive view of knowledge as personally constructed and evidence-based) to be reflected by low agreement with both generalized absolute and generalized multiplicistic statements. This article suggests considering absolutism and multiplicism as separate dimensions. Most quantitative epistemic belief inventories neglect this and understand epistemic sophistication as disagreement with absolute statements. Particularly in higher education, not only a view of science as a means of finding absolute truths (absolutism), but also a view of science as generally tentative (multiplicism) can be unsophisticated and obstructive for learning. Autodesk Inventor Professional 2015 Keygen Generatorl
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |